.png)
Private Equity Touchdown: What it Means for the Future of the NFL
The NFL now allows private equity (PE) funds to invest in teams, marking a significant shift in its governance structures.
Under new rules, investors can acquire up to a 10% stake in individual franchises, with a minimum commitment of $2 billion, often achieved through leverage. Leverage allows PE firms to use debt to finance acquisitions, increasing potential returns but also raising financial risk if the investment underperforms. Investors must hold their stakes for at least six years, with investments capped at six teams, meaning a total potential commitment of $12 billion.
This change is intended to provide capital for owners seeking an exit strategy or divestment while facilitating team sales as franchise values appreciate, especially with the NFL’s $110 billion media rights deal.
However, the NFL's ownership rules remain more stringent than other sport leagues. In European football, PE firms have been involved in the acquisition of AC Milan and Chelsea F.C. The freedom given to private equity in Europe has led to concerns about inflated valuations based on unrealistic projections of future growth. Critics argue that some clubs, like Manchester United, are prioritising commercial success over on-the-pitch success.
There are also concerns that the short investment horizon of PE firms (typically four to seven years) might conflict with the aims of sports teams, which prioritise sustained competitive success. This raises questions about whether the NFL can strike a balance between allowing PE firms to invest and maintain the competitive integrity of its teams.
This feeds into an interesting conversation about Antitrust/Competition Concerns:
Ownership of Multiple Teams:
If a PE firm invests in multiple NFL franchises, there is a risk of conflicts of interest. For example, a PE firm might influence franchise strategies to benefit its portfolio profits, not the competitiveness of individual teams.
Such concerns are similar to those of multi-ownership models in European football, where the City Football Group owns 13 teams. UEFA had to offer divestment options to City Football Group to prevent conflicts between Manchester City and Girona F.C. competing in the same league.
Preferred Buyers:
The NFL’s process of choosing “preferred buyers” could be deemed anti-competitive. Limiting the number of investors may reduce competition and raise concerns about whether this favours certain firms, potentially infringing on antitrust laws.
Influence on League Decision-Making:
PE firms, motivated by profit, could push for changes in NFL policies. This could involve advocating for a reduction in the NFL’s salary cap, aiming to maximise returns on investment.
The NFL must carefully regulate private equity involvement to ensure it doesn’t undermine team competitiveness or fan interests. Allowing for governance structures that balance profit motives with long-term competitive integrity will be key to maintaining the NFL’s success.
Glossary Terms:
Leverage: Borrowing to boost investment returns, but increasing risk.
Capital: Financial assets or their value.
Divestment: Selling assets to streamline operations or meet regulations.
Governance structures: Systems that direct and control organizations.
Exit strategy: A plan for a firm to sell its investment and profit.
Investment horizon: The period PE firms expect to hold an investment.
Anti-competitive: Practices that reduce market competition, often scrutinized by antitrust laws.
Sources:
Financial Times - NFL to allow private equity investment for first time
Investopedia - Understanding Private Equity (PE)
